Saturday, January 9, 2010
The desktop and laptop killer that they won't make
Netbooks are perfect for performing the tasks that 75% (pure guess) of computers are used for. Web and email.
Enter the smartphone. First the Apple iPhone, now the Motorola Droid. These are sophisticated computers. Not smart phones, but computers that happen to be phones too. The iPhone 3gs and the Motorola Droid both pack a 550 MHz processor. The new Google Nexus phone has a 1 GHz processor. There are tons of netbooks out there that are being sold with the 1Ghz ATOM processor.
So, today's smart phones and netbooks are close or equal when it comes to computing power.
My Droid came with 16GB of storage standard and can be upgraded to 32GB by simply replacing the MicroSD card. 16GB or 32GB is plenty of storage for a netbook. We are not talking about a machine that we will be archiving family photos and videos on.
There should be dockable home and mobile computers that can interface with our smart phone.
How about a laptop that has nothing but a screen and keyboard that you can slide your droid into. Once inserted you can use a full size keyboard and monitor with your droid. You have fast 3G internet speed. Most people would need nothing more than this. The droid would draw minimal power at this point, because the phone's screen could remain off. The laptop dock would need power, but only for the LCD monitor.
At home, we have a similar docking station, one that has interfaces for our keyboard, mouse, monitor and printer. When docked, the droid could even be used as an additional input device, making use of custom touchable icons.
It's ingenious. Your mother needs a cell phone and computer? Give her the Droid and a dock and she's all set.
I'm not sure if the video output of the Droid is high enough resolution for an external monitor, but I have no doubt it would be easy to do. The current Droid may be a little underpowered as a netbook, but the new Nexus phone and all smartphones in the future should be able to handle day to day computing tasks with no problem.
I'll bet we won't see something like this at CES. I wonder why? I can't be the first person to have thought of this.
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
USB devices not recognized until reboot
Monday, October 26, 2009
Getting the Acer 5620z w/ Broadcom BCM94311MCG to work with Ubuntu 9.04
echo -e 'blacklist bcm43xx' | sudo tee -a /etc/modprobe.d/blacklistsudo apt-get install ndiswrapper-utils-1.9mkdir ~/bcm43xx; cd ~/bcm43xxsudo apt-get install cabextractwget ftp://ftp.compaq.com/pub/softpaq/sp34001-34500/sp34152.execabextract sp34152.exesudo ndiswrapper -i bcmwl5.infndiswrapper -lsudo depmod -asudo modprobe ndiswrappersudo cp /etc/network/interfaces /etc/network/interfaces.origecho -e 'auto lo\niface lo inet loopback\n' | sudo tee /etc/network/interfacessudo ndiswrapper -mecho 'ndiswrapper' | sudo tee -a /etc/modulesecho 'ENABLED=0' | sudo tee -a /etc/default/wpasupplicant
UFRaw from the command line!
Thumbnail size in folder view
Sunday, October 25, 2009
Ubuntu 9.04 not seeing external hard disk without reboot
Monday, July 27, 2009
Good things about Windows

It's not official yet, but a lot of people and news sources are proclaiming Windows Vista to be a disaster. Some are comparing Vista to be a disaster on the scale of Windows Millenium. Some sites will tell you that Microsoft is about ready to cut bait on Vista and move on to the next OS.
I personally have taken great pains to remove Vista from my laptop and install Windows XP instead. I don't consider myself to be a typical user, however. I expect great performance from my applications, and from my computer hardware. I wasn't getting it.
I'm not down on Microsoft, mind you. There will be growing pains with any major new OS release. There are more computers out there now than when XP was released. A ton more peripherals are on the market now also, both old and new. Still, people expect their applications and components to all work seamlessly with the next OS. It is a reasonable, yet hard to deliver upon expectation.
Moving forward, let's take a look at a few of the good things about Windows Vista. I have put together a poll of 20 random Windows Vista user to find out what they LIKE about Vista. That's right, some people actually found some GOOD point regarding Vista. I asked each person in my informal survey to name three things they like about the OS.
Let me preface the review of this chart by saying that a lot of the things some people consider positives about Vista, other people consider negatives. In the next day or so I will publish a similar article entitled "What people dislike about Windows Vista".
Not surprising, almost everyone surveyed approved of the Aero theme in Vista. It is very aesthetically pleasing, and it is something I missed when I went back to XP.
The other positives many people agree on are Security and the Search features. Vista feels and I think actually is, very secure. The UAC (User Access Control), while a pain in the butt at times, does make it fairly difficult for someone to hijack your PC. The Search features of Vista are nice also, but it comes at a cost. The indexing service in Vista seems to ALWAYS be running in the background, and is ALWAYS hogging our valuable PC resources. Is it worth it?
Several people identified the interface as being superior. I'm not sure if they meant the UI was actually better, or just prettier.
The rest of the items on the list were noted by just a few. I've had problems with performance, the compression utility, compatibility and stability in my trial run with Vista. Apparently others have not.
Vista - pretty and secure. Next time I'll look at what survey respondents considered to be weaknesses of Windows Vista.